I’m watching on YouTube: How Thor Ragnarok Should Have Ended

https://youtu.be/lPZRmkVLeOE
How Thor Ragnarok Should Have Ended
How Thor Ragnarok Should Have Ended

Watch More HISHEs: https://bit.ly/HISHEPlaylist
Subscribe to HISHE: https://bit.ly/HISHEsubscribe

Guest Voice Actor Andrew Robinson of The Brothers Robinson
https://www.youtube.com/user/TheBrothersRobinson

Background Artwork – Otis Frampton
https://ift.tt/2Etq6nA

Twitter @theHISHEdotcom
http://bit.ly/HISHETwitter
Instagram @HISHEgram
https://ift.tt/1WQsoC6
Facebook: http://bit.ly/HISHE-FB
HISHE Swag:
How It Should Have Ended

————–Previous Episodes——————–
Thor Sings – Not Worthy

How Spider-Man Homecoming Should Have Ended

Batman V Superman – Comedy Recap

How The Incredibles Should Have Ended

Villain Pub – Penny For Your Fears

Blade Runner – HISHE Dubs

Rogue One LEGO HISHE – Chirrut VS Everything

How Wonder Woman Should Have Ended

How Guardians of the Galaxy Vol.2 Should Have Ended

How Jurassic World Should Have Ended:
http://bit.ly/JurassicWorldHISHE

Hulk Spoils Movies

How Kong Skull Island Should Have Ended

How Rogue One Should Have Ended

How Moana Should Have Ended

How The LEGO Batman Movie Should Have Ended

How Doctor Strange Should Have Ended

How Beauty and the Beast Should Have Ended

How Star Wars Should Have Ended (Special Edition)

More HISHE Reviews

Villain Pub – The Boss Battle

LEGO Harry Potter in 90 Seconds

Suicide Squad HISHE

How Guardians of the Galaxy Vol.1 Should Have Ended

Star Trek Beyond HISHE

Super Cafe: Batman GO

Civil War HISHE

Villain Pub – The New Smile

How Batman V Superman Should Have Ended

TMNT: Out of the Shadows HISHE

How Deadpool Should Have Ended

Hero Swap – Gladiator Starring Iron Man

How X-Men: Days of Future Past Should Have Ended:
http://bit.ly/X-MenDOFPHISHE

Star Wars – Revenge of the Sith HISHE

Jungle Book HISHE

BAT BLOOD – A Batman V Superman AND Bad Blood Parody ft. Batman:
http://bit.ly/BatBlood

Villain Pub – The New Smile:
http://bit.ly/VPNewSmile

I’m watching on YouTube: How Avengers Infinity War Should Have Ended

https://youtu.be/NcEbZ_vexA8
How Avengers Infinity War Should Have Ended
How Infinity War Should Have Ended
Sorry we couldn’t make the video longer.

Watch More HISHEs: https://bit.ly/HISHEPlaylist
Subscribe to HISHE: https://bit.ly/HISHEsubscribe

Twitter @theHISHEdotcom

Instagram @HISHEgram
https://ift.tt/1WQsoC6
Facebook:
https://ift.tt/LjhiyN
HISHE Swag:
How It Should Have Ended

————–Previous Episodes——————–
Jurassic World – Comedy Recap (HISHE Dubs)

Oceans Over 40 Trailer

How Black Panther Should Have Ended

Villain Pub – The Dead Pool

How Justice League Should Have Ended

How Star Wars The Last Jedi Should Have Ended

How Thor Ragnarok Should Have Ended

How Spider-Man Homecoming Should Have Ended

Avengers Infinity War and Beyond (Toy Story Mashup)

How IT Should Have Ended

Batman V Superman – Comedy Recap

How The Incredibles Should Have Ended

Villain Pub – Penny For Your Fears

Blade Runner – Comedy Recap

Rogue One LEGO HISHE – Chirrut VS Everything

How Wonder Woman Should Have Ended

How Guardians of the Galaxy Vol.2 Should Have Ended

How Jurassic World Should Have Ended:

Hulk Spoils Movies

How Kong Skull Island Should Have Ended

How Rogue One Should Have Ended

How Moana Should Have Ended

How The LEGO Batman Movie Should Have Ended

How Doctor Strange Should Have Ended

How Beauty and the Beast Should Have Ended

How Star Wars Should Have Ended (Special Edition)

More HISHE Reviews

Villain Pub – The Boss Battle

LEGO Harry Potter in 90 Seconds

Suicide Squad HISHE

How Guardians of the Galaxy Vol.1 Should Have Ended

Star Trek Beyond HISHE

Super Cafe: Batman GO

Civil War HISHE

Villain Pub – The New Smile

How Batman V Superman Should Have Ended

TMNT: Out of the Shadows HISHE

How Deadpool Should Have Ended

Hero Swap – Gladiator Starring Iron Man

How X-Men: Days of Future Past Should Have Ended:

Star Wars – Revenge of the Sith HISHE

Jungle Book HISHE

BAT BLOOD – A Batman V Superman AND Bad Blood Parody ft. Batman:

Villain Pub – The New Smile:
https://youtu.be/0oP8s4GK1BE

Wikipedia article of the day for June 29, 2018

The Wikipedia article of the day for June 29, 2018 is Ice drilling.
Ice drilling allows scientists studying glaciers and ice sheets to gain access beneath the ice, to take measurements along its interior, and to retrieve samples. Instruments in the bored holes can record temperature, pressure, speed, and direction of ice movement. Many different methods have been used since 1840, when the first scientific ice drilling expedition attempted to bore through the Unteraargletscher in the Alps. Two early methods were percussion, in which the ice is fractured and pulverized, and rotary drilling, a method often used in mineral exploration for rock drilling. In the 1940s, thermal drills that melt ice were developed, and jets of hot water or steam to bore through ice soon followed. A growing interest in ice cores, used for paleoclimatological research, led to the development of ice coring drills in the 1950s and 1960s, and there are now many different coring drills in use.

Wikipedia article of the day for June 28, 2018

The Wikipedia article of the day for June 28, 2018 is The Portage to San Cristobal of A.H..
The Portage to San Cristobal of A.H. is a 1981 literary and philosophical novella by George Steiner (shown). The story is about Jewish Nazi hunters who find a fictional Adolf Hitler (A.H.) alive in the Amazon jungle thirty years after the end of World WarΒ II. The book was controversial, particularly among reviewers and Jewish scholars, because the author allows Hitler to defend himself when he is put on trial in the jungle by his captors. There Hitler maintains that Israel owes its existence to the Holocaust and that he is the “benefactor of the Jews”. A central theme of The Portage is the nature of language, and revolves around Steiner’s lifelong work on the subject and his fascination in the power and terror of human speech. Other themes include the philosophical and moral analysis of history, justice, guilt and revenge. Despite the controversy, it was a 1983 finalist in the PEN/Faulkner Award for Fiction. It was adapted for the theatre by British playwright Christopher Hampton.

New from Equal Rights Advocates: On the Supreme Court’s Decision in Janus v. AFSCME

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Wednesday, June 27, 2018

CONTACT
Delia Coleman, dcoleman@equalrights.org, 415-575-2396

 

On the Supreme Court’s Decision in Janus v. AFSCME

Ruling Will Hurt Workers, Especially Women of Color

 

The following is a statement from Noreen Farrell, Executive Director, Equal Rights Advocates on the Supreme Court’s decision in Janus v. AFSCME, in which the Court ruled 5-4 that public sector unions may not collect β€œfair share” fees from non-union workers who benefit from the union-negotiated contracts but are not dues-paying members.

β€œToday, the Supreme Court has once again decided to ignore justice and the needs of working women, particularly the large numbers of women of color who rely on the benefits and wages of unionized jobs. Their decision to attack working people’s basic right to come together and fight for better wages and working conditions wrenches the clock back to a time of robber barons squeezing every drop of labor from their workers with impunity. But while this Court, and this Administration, wage war against working families, we are resolved to keep fighting.

This decision is particularly devastating for women who work under union contracts. The labor movement and the best practices it has won for its members have been crucial to women’s improved economic status, our access to regular and good-quality healthcare, and our access to opportunities and promotion, especially in male-dominated fields. When women of color join unions, their median earnings are higher compared to non-union workers. Hispanic women have the largest earning advantage when they’re in unions. Women in labor unions are also more likely to have health insurance provided by their employer or union. With their decision, the Court has given employers permission to slowly choke off this kind of benefit for working women and their families.

As a result, this decision is a back-door attempt at not only curbing the advantages labor unions bring to working and middle class families; it is also a terrible attempt to halt the advancement of working women in our tracks.

Since our founding in 1974, Equal Rights Advocates has spearheaded work dedicated to achieving economic justice for women workers, particularly those facing the most egregious forms of sex discrimination and unjust working conditions compounded by other barriers to fair treatment and equal opportunity in the workplace.

We will not let this unjust decision stand, and we are in solidarity with labor unions across the country who are a bulwark of economic justice for all working people.”

 

The post On the Supreme Court’s Decision in Janus v. AFSCME appeared first on Equal Rights Advocates.

By: ERA Staff
Published at: June 28, 2018 at 07:02AM
View on EqualRights.org

New from Equal Rights Advocates: Legal and Advocacy Groups Demand DeVos Withdraw False Claims About Sexual Assault Cases

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Wednesday, June 27, 2018

 

CONTACTS
Equal Rights Advocates: Jess Eagle, 415.575.2380, jeagle@equalrights.org
Democracy Forward: Charisma Troiano, 202.701.1781, ctroiano@democracyforward.org

 

Legal and Advocacy Groups Demand Betsy DeVos Withdraw False Claims About Sexual Assault Cases

Trump Administration Violated Federal Law in Using Unsupported and Misleading Claims To Roll Back Title IX Protections for Student Survivors of Sexual Violence

Washington, DC β€” Today, Equal Rights Advocates and 12 other civil rights and legal advocacy groups petitioned the Department of Education (β€œDOE”) to retract and correct its misleading and unreliable 2017 β€œDear Colleague Letter” which, along with an accompanying Question and Answer document, established the Trump Administration’s discriminatory new Title IX policy. The groups seek corrections under the Information Quality Act (β€œIQA”), a data accuracy law that requires government agencies provide accurate, reliable, and unbiased information to the public, particularly when such information has a clear impact on public policy.

The 2017 β€œDear Colleague Letter,” signed by Acting Assistant Secretary Candice Jackson, contains at least six incorrect and unsupported statements of fact. For example, it states, without proof, that under the prior Title IX guidance:

  • Many schools established procedures for resolving allegations that … are overwhelmingly stacked against the accused;
  • Many schools traditionally employed a higher clear-and-convincing evidence standard; and
  • Many schools established procedures for resolving allegations that lack the most basic elements of fairness and due process.

These factual assertions run counter to the available evidence, which may be why DOE did not cite any evidence to support them. β€œ[T]he inaccurate information disseminated…incorrectly suggests that students who claim they have experienced sexual violence (primarily women and girls) are being given unfair advantages in comparison to their alleged perpetrators (primarily men and boys),” the groups state in their correction demand. β€œ[The] prevention and redress of sexual harassment and violence in educational institutions is a serious issue, [but] the Department disrespects the issue, as well as the people who experience it, when it relies on and disseminates information that lack the basic attributes of quality.”

The IQA demand letter was submitted on June 27, 2018. Under IQA guidelines, the Administration has 60 days to respond to the request for correction.

Along with Equal Rights Advocates, the other signatories to the letter include Democracy Forward, the National Center for Youth Law, SurvJustice, National Women’s Law Center, Victim Rights Law Center, End Rape on Campus, Futures Without Violence, Public Justice, Legal Voice, Know Your IX, a project of Advocates for Youth, American Association of University Women, and Legal Momentum, the Women’s Legal Defense and Education Fund.

SurvJustice, Equal Rights Advocates, and Victim Rights Law Center have an active lawsuit against DeVos and the DOE challenging the new Title IX guidance as an unlawful, discriminatory, and unconstitutional policy. The groups are represented by Democracy Forward, the National Center for Youth Law, and the National Women’s Law Center.

—  

Equal Rights Advocates (www.equalrights.org ) is a national civil rights organization fighting gender discrimination in workplaces and education through litigation, public policy and advocacy, and partnerships with workers and students.  

The post Legal and Advocacy Groups Demand DeVos Withdraw False Claims About Sexual Assault Cases appeared first on Equal Rights Advocates.

By: ERA Staff
Published at: June 28, 2018 at 05:10AM
View on EqualRights.org

Wikipedia article of the day for June 27, 2018

The Wikipedia article of the day for June 27, 2018 is Monroe Edwards.
Monroe Edwards (1808–1847) was an American slave trader who was convicted of forgery after a well-publicized trial in 1842. Originally from Kentucky, Edwards moved to New Orleans, then settled in Texas. He smuggled slaves into Brazil in 1832 and into Texas in 1836. After a swindle, he was forced to flee the Republic of Texas to the United States. He tried to scam money out of various abolitionists in the United States and the United Kingdom, partly with forged letters of introduction. He then forged letters from cotton brokers in New Orleans, which he used to secure bank drafts for large sums. His fabrications caught up with him and he was arrested and tried. Convicted partly because his distinctive good looks made him memorable and easily recognizable, and partly from repetitive spelling errors in his forgeries, Edwards was sentenced to 10 years in prison, and died while incarcerated. He is mentioned in Herman Melville’s 1853 short story “Bartleby, the Scrivener”.